Econation Blog


Misleading recycling arrows


The triangular-arrows symbol on plastic containers that suggests they are recyclable is misleading, says Recyclers of New Zealand (RONZ). They say that in many cases such containers are not recyclable.

The international plastics industry uses the universally recognised triangular recycling symbol with a centrally-placed number - one to seven - which signify the industry resin-code numbering system.

But the symbols do not represent recyclability. The SPI codes one to six are specific as to their base resin, and code seven meant the material could be anything else or combinations of any number of the resins. Manufacturers may also add other plastic and non-plastic materials to the base resin to give the finished material certain performance characteristics. This means that plastics which are marked as recyclable have no prospect of being recycled.

RONZ Executive director Bruce Gledhill said RONZ tries to convince brand owners of the need to validate their claims for New Zealand.

"RONZ advocates for the labelling laws to incorporate mandatory use of a series of recycling symbols that are appropriate and validated in the New Zealand context. Manufacturers and retailers should verify that their product can actually be recycled before using such claims."

RONZ has suggested providing more information with the arrow symbols. An E could be used to show the material was suitable as an energy source, an M for those suitable for recovery of their material value, and an X for products that should not enter the recycling stream because of hazard risks.

Paul Curtis, executive director of the Packaging Council of New Zealand, agreed the resin codes on plastic packaging "fell short of what was desirable". He said the problem was exacerbated by the differing recycling practices of local councils.
In Auckland and Christchurch the councils collected codes one to seven plastics, but in Wellington only codes one and two were collected.

That meant a countrywide code would not be practical, he said.

Mr Curtis said the key was for councils to collaborate to collect greater volumes of plastic types for which markets could be found.


For a description of the seven plastic types click here>>

Posted by Michael Lockhart on 7th March, 2009 | Comments | Trackbacks
Tags: General Sustainability

Bookmark and Share

The trackback URL for this page is http://www.econation.co.nz/trackback?post=3553410


Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks for this post


Comments

There are no comments for this post


Post a Comment

HTML is not allowed in comments, http://... will be automatically linked.


Name (required):


Homepage:


Email Address (not displayed):


Heading:


Comment (required):


To help prevent spam, please enter the word chop here:


Archives

June 2011
May 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009

Tags

Book Review (3)
Business Sustainability (15)
Climate Change (7)
Design for sustainability (3)
Doing more with less (6)
Education (5)
Environment (7)
Food (2)
Frogblog (1)
General Sustainability (76)
Government (10)
Pictures (3)
Scoop article (7)
Social equity (3)

home | basics | why? | solutions | heroes | business | design | education | about | resources | blog
© 2008 - 2012 Econation. Powered by Web Genius
Page: Misleading recycling arrows - Last Updated: 4th February, 2012 | Site Map