Econation Blog


Consumption does not guarantee happiness


The percentage of people in Northern countries calling themselves happy peaked in the 1950s - even though consumption has more than doubled since then. Indeed, there is no consistent correlation between income, consumption and happiness. A global comparison of measures of happiness in relation to levels of income per capita indicates that the richer the country, the smaller the correlation between income level and individual happiness.

"It is no accident workers who are earning a lot of money because they work long hours provide the market for the very goods they are producing, and never mind if they do not really need the goods in question. The consumption becomes the reward for the hard work and the long hours.

"Nevertheless, it cannot be a very satisfying reward, the conditions of dissatisfaction must be maintained, or markets for useless products would disappear under a gale of common sense. We become addicted to consumption, which provides no lasting satisfaction."

Source: Carley, M. and Spapens, P. (1998) Sharing the World: Sustainable Living and Global Equity in the 21st Century, Earthscan, London, p. 143.

This explanation of the paradox suggests that 'dissatisfaction' is central to market economies as they rely upon people becoming caught up a vicious 'cycle of work-and-spend' - just like a fast-spinning wheel in which consumption must be paid for by long hours of work - which need to be rewarded by more consumption, and so on.

A second explanation of this paradox relates to the lack of regular contact with nature in modern life:

"The consumer society required that human contact with nature, once direct, frequent, and intense, be mediated by technology and organisation. In large numbers we moved indoors, A more contrived and controlled landscape replaced one that had been far less contrived and controllable. Wild animals, once regarded as teachers and companions, wee increasingly replaced with animals bred for docility and dependence.

"Our sense of reality, once shaped by our complex sensory interplay with the seasons, sky, forest, wildlife, savanna, desert, river, sea and night sky, increasingly came to be shaped by technology and artful realities. Compulsive consumption, perhaps a form of grieving or perhaps evidence of boredom, is a response to the fact that we find ourselves exiles and strangers in a diminished world that we once called home."

Orr, D. (1999) The ecology of giving and receiving, in R. Rosenblatt (ed) Consuming Desires: Consumption, Culture, and the Pursuit of Happiness, Island Press, Washington DC, p. 141.

Read the original source at UNESCO

Posted by Michael Lockhart on 29th September, 2009 | Comments | Trackbacks
Tags: General Sustainability

Bookmark and Share

The trackback URL for this page is http://www.econation.co.nz/trackback?post=15744002


Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks for this post


Comments

There are no comments for this post


Post a Comment

HTML is not allowed in comments, http://... will be automatically linked.


Name (required):


Homepage:


Email Address (not displayed):


Heading:


Comment (required):


To help prevent spam, please enter the word aloe here:


Archives

June 2011
May 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009

Tags

Book Review (3)
Business Sustainability (15)
Climate Change (7)
Design for sustainability (3)
Doing more with less (6)
Education (5)
Environment (7)
Food (2)
Frogblog (1)
General Sustainability (76)
Government (10)
Pictures (3)
Scoop article (7)
Social equity (3)

home | basics | why? | solutions | heroes | business | design | education | about | resources | blog
© 2008 - 2012 Econation. Powered by Web Genius
Page: Consumption does not guarantee happiness - Last Updated: 4th February, 2012 | Site Map