|
|
Econation Blog
Book review: The Spirit Level
The Spirit Level written by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett argues that almost every social problem common in developed societies – reduced life expectancy, child mortality, child well-being, drugs, crime, homicide rates, mental illness and obesity – has a single root cause, inequality of income and wealth.
Yhey measure equality (or inequality) as the difference between the richest and the poorest 20% of the population. New Zealand has the sixth biggest gap between the richest and the poorest out of 23 rich countries that were included in the authors' study. It was embarassing to read that New Zealand rates highly in many of the social problems above.
The other English-speaking democracies – UK, USA, Canada and Australia – are highly unequal as well with the USA not only having the highest inequality but also rating highest on most of the social problems studied.
The countries with the least inequality – such as Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Japan – also have the lowest rates of social problems.
Whilst most of the book is given to describing and explaining how the social problems correlate to income inequality, which makes for sobering reading, the part that interested me most was their opinion on solutions.
Their belief is that economic growth not only creates inequality it also hides it. Right-wing apologists often pontificate that 'a rising tide raises all boats'. This might be true but it hides the real problem which is that it doesn't raise all the boats equally. The problems of society are noy caused by average or total wealth but by relative wealth. Wilkinson and Pickett go to lengths to explain that the problems they describe are caused by inequality and that there is no correlation between average per capita income and their index of social problems.
A solution they suggest is to get rid of the ideology of growth and the motive of profits which benefits the rich minority and instead redistribute wealth within a steady-state economy. They suggest that redistribution could be achieved in a number of different ways such as having more equaly incomes in the firs place (like Japan) or through taxes, benefits and plugging tax loopholes for businesses (as in Sweden, Noway and Denmark). An example would be the so-called Robin Hood Tax where a tiny tax is put on all financial transactions. The ultimate solution would be a combination of solutions.
The authors suggest that one way to equalise incomes is democratic employee ownership of business. They quote Robert Oakeshott, a British authority on employee-ownership who says it 'entails a movement from business as a piece of property to business as a working community'. An employee-owned business provides greater equality by extending liberty and democracy. In other words it is a bottom-up approach as distinct from a top-down approach like increasing taxes and welfare benefits.
The authors make the point that a democratic employee-owned business may allow for the CEO to receive several times the average wage of all the employees but they wouldn't agree to a CEO salary which is hundreds of times the average as is the case in many large corporations of today – which are obviously far from democratic.
From a sustainability perspective a more equal, steady-state economy would have mush higher levels of well-being at the same time as using less resources and generating less waste.
For more information and explanation visit www.equalitytrust.org.uk
Read the NZ Herald article: Wealth gap divides nation
Posted by Michael Lockhart on 22nd January, 2011 | Comments | Trackbacks
Tags: General Sustainability, Book Review, Social equity
The trackback URL for this page is http://www.econation.co.nz/trackback?post=23053979 TrackbacksThere are no trackbacks for this post There are no comments for this post Post a CommentHTML is not allowed in comments, http://... will be automatically linked.
|
|
|
|
